DS News

Legal Industry Update

DSNews delivers stories, ideas, links, companies, people, events, and videos impacting the mortgage default servicing industry.

Issue link: http://digital.dsnews.com/i/441572

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 60 of 147

59 » VISIT US ONLINE @ DSNEWS.COM the outstanding debt on a property in Iowa is rarely sufficient to justify preserving the right to a deficiency. Further, trial courts in Iowa are quick to admonish servicers and their counsel if deficiency rights are preserved, particularly since the economic downturn. Servicers and investors should work with local foreclosure counsel in such jurisdictions to determine whether waiving deficiency is required or recommended as a best course of action. Future Considerations Regarding Pursuit of Deficiencies Jurisdiction is just one of the factors to consider in concluding whether or not to seek a deficiency judgment against a borrower. In order to further minimize losses, investors would benefit from considering additional factors and creating clear policies so that the appropriate course of action is determined from the outset of the foreclosure. For instance, investors could set a threshold unpaid principal balance amount in order to avoid the cost of preserving a deficiency in cases where the deficiency is bound to be a negligible amount. Another factor to consider might be whether or not the property is confirmed to be vacant or abandoned. In order to ensure best practices in each jurisdiction, servicers are encouraged to consult with their local foreclosure counsel and to heed counsel's advice as to whether deficiency rights should be preserved or pursued in that particular jurisdiction. 1 FHFA's Oversight of the Enterprises' Efforts to Recover Losses from Foreclosure Sales. http://origin.www.fhfaoig.gov/ Content/Files/AUD-2013-001.pdf (October 17, 2012). 2 Management of Deficiency Balances, AB 2013-05. http://www.fhfa.gov/ SupervisionRegulation/AdvisoryBulletins/ AdvisoryBulletinDocuments/20130916_ AB_2013-05_Management-of-Deficiency- Balances_508.pdf (September 16, 2013). 3 DC ST § 42-816.4 735 ILCS 5/15- 1508(b)(2).5 Roberts v. Murray, 232 S.W.2d 540, 546 (Mo. 1950); Cockrell v. Taylor, 145 S.W.2d 416, 422 (Mo. 1940).6 F.S.A. § 702.06.7 K.S.A. 60-2415.8 Olathe Bank v. Mann, 252 Kan. 351, 357 (1993).9 A.R.S. § 33-729.10 Cal.C.C.P. § 580(b). 11 I.C.A. § 654.6.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of DS News - Legal Industry Update