DS News

Separate and Unequal-DS News Aug. 2015

DSNews delivers stories, ideas, links, companies, people, events, and videos impacting the mortgage default servicing industry.

Issue link: http://digital.dsnews.com/i/551252

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 74 of 99

» VISIT US ONLINE @ DSNEWS.COM 73 Conventional wisdom holds that subprime loans were at the root of the mortgage crisis which dominated the first decade of this century and contributed to the worst financial calamity in more than 70 years. But a new analysis of the mortgage crisis, which cost millions of families their homes and brought down storied financial institutions such as Lehman Brothers and Washington Mutual, suggests prime loans, not subprime, were the major driver and "the crisis was not solely, or even primarily, a subprime sector event." at's the conclusion of Fernando Ferreira and Joseph Gyourko of e Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania in their paper "A New Look at the U.S. Foreclosure Crisis: Panel Data Evidence of Prime and Subprime Borrowers From 1997 to 2012." is paper was released in June by the National Bureau of Economic Research. Current LTVs, they said in their study, were the reason so many borrowers defaulted. "ere are only seven quarters at the beginning of the housing bust in which there were more homes lost by subprime borrowers than by prime borrowers," Ferreira and Gyourko said. According to their research, 39,094 more subprime borrowers than prime borrowers lost their homes from 3Q 2006 through 1Q 2008. e difference, the authors said, was completely reversed by the beginning of 2009 when 40,630 more prime than subprime borrowers lost their homes. "Sharply higher subprime distress rates became evident early in the housing bust just as the previous literature showed," the authors said. "However those high rates never affected anything close to a majority of the market. Moreover, loss rates among the much larger group of prime borrowers started to increase shortly thereafter – within a year." e observation that loans to subprime borrowers were the first to fall is consistent, said Michael C. Smith, a longtime bank credit officer and former executive a government sponsored enterprise during the peak of the foreclosure crisis, with his own experience. "I'm not at all surprised the prime foreclosures dominated the foreclosure activity precisely because prime was such a large part of the market and because a lowering tide sinks all boats," he said. at simple explanation that prime loans dominated because there a lot more of them, according to Gyourko, is only one factor. Instead, the authors look to current LTV as the principal cause of default. Did Prime Loans Cause The Mortgage Crisis? COVER STORY INDUSTRY INSIGHT SUCCESS FORMUL A INDUSTRY INSIGHT

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of DS News - Separate and Unequal-DS News Aug. 2015