DS News

DS News March 2018

DSNews delivers stories, ideas, links, companies, people, events, and videos impacting the mortgage default servicing industry.

Issue link: http://digital.dsnews.com/i/945927

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 30 of 99

» VISIT US ONLINE @ DSNEWS.COM 29 Since the law on this issue is not yet crystallized, working with clients to achieve a consistent adjustment process can be challenging. Another challenge relates to loans that are involved in service transfers. Clients review service transfer cases for Statute of Limitations issues and determine if these cases need to be re-demanded after boarding and what default date is applicable. In Florida, we are required to certify possession of original collateral, which servicers must receive from prior servicers. Complaints must be verified by the plaintiff, which takes time. As such, we see instances where the adjustment included in the re-demand does not allow adequate adjustment to account for the time to have the matter prepared and filed. is leads to the need to re-adjust and re-demand. I work with clients to help them establish efficiency in their adjustment process. In recent months, Florida had been dealing with both a hurricane impact and with evacuees coming in from Puerto Rico. What impact is this having on foreclosures in the state, and what other impacts are you seeing? Two words: "FEMA holds"—absolutely necessary, and absolutely challenging. Having robust data management was critical in managing FEMA holds. Immediately after Hurricane Irma, I communicated with clients and investors with recommendations regarding how to manage the portfolios that were impacted by the FEMA holds. We identified administrative responsibilities that could not be abated during the holds such as Black Knight Inc. reprojection requirements, etc. We identified pending litigation issues that required motion practice and judicial intervention to protect the client. is led to managing Court expectations in areas that were not severely impacted by the hurricane. Some judges were reluctant to abate cases due to a global hold mandate. is led to additional effort and filing pleadings explaining client regulatory and policy requirements. Our discussion of these issues with clients and investors was information they considered in reaching a decision to allow an additional fee to compensate for the services required during the hold period. What are the cases you're working on or seeing right now that you think have the potential to have the largest impact on the industry going forward? Florida defense attorneys are constantly testing new legal theories in defense of foreclosure litigation. As we discussed, Statute of Limitations remains an issue being tested and challenged by defense counsel. Issues related to default adjustments remain very much in play. "Standing" continues to be an issue we see regularly. Under Florida law, the plaintiff must establish that it was the owner of the underlying promissory note and that it was in possession of a properly endorsed promissory note at the time of filing the complaint. Where a note is lost, the plaintiff can proceed under a Lost Note Statute but must establish the transfer history of the note. "HUD Face-to-Face" requirements have been judicially established to be a condition precedent to filing suit on mortgages that provide for the meetings. at process is being raised in defense of cases and where a defendant can prove failure to comply, judgment can be entered on their behalf together with entitlement to prevailing party attorney fees. "Bankruptcy surrender" is an issue that continues to have impact. e theory is that borrowers who surrender their property in a bankruptcy proceeding cannot later defend in the foreclosure proceeding. e rationale relates to the fact that a borrower receives a bankruptcy discharge on bankruptcy and therefore cannot later defend enforcement of the collateral. While the majority of bankruptcy judges agree with cases that support this interpretation of the law, several judges are struggling with that interpretation. e most recent issue relates to challenges to the "boarding process." Plaintiffs are being challenged on their boarding process. is is a critical area because a proper boarding process is the cornerstone to introducing prior servicer records into evidence at trial. Having a robust boarding process together with adequate training for staff that testify on behalf of plaintiffs is critically important. What do you wish more people understood about your job, or your industry? Over the past 25 years, I have dealt with historically low foreclosure volume, historically high volume, and back to historically low volume. roughout those years, I have stayed the course in providing my clients thorough legal representation, which often included telling them things that were difficult to hear and even more difficult to manage. Over time, I have learned to balance the "legal side" of my practice with the "process side." is results in providing the best possible legal representation in the most efficient and cost-effective way possible. From a client management perspective, servicers categorize foreclosure firms as "vendors," which at times clouds the fact that the service we provide are "lawyer" services. is often requires varying levels of flexibility in day-to-day vendor management. I have found, and continue to develop, a balance in my practice which I call "lawyer centric." About my industry? I believe we are at the new normal, and default activity will not return to past volume in the foreseeable future. is is the time for the industry to retool and improve on processes that require adapting and being proactive with change. Identifying the needs that differentiate judicial practice with non-judicial practice is difficult but necessary. I am seeing tremendous improvement in that regard and continue to work with my clients to effectively manage the challenges they face in the current environment. "In the current environment, the challenges for the servicing industry are different than those that existed during the mortgage crisis. Volume and timelines were the drivers and created a "process driven" model, which has given way to more contested litigation in Florida. The percentage of foreclosure cases that are defended and litigated shifted from a 2010 low of 2 percent to current rates of approximately 60 percent. That shift leads to two important focus points: quality attorney advocacy and strong capability to manage by data."

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of DS News - DS News March 2018